CSI Normal

The roles that I noticed my teammates filling were completer and contractor. Zach, Avery, Erik, and myself primarily held the completer role because we were collectively gathering information from the sheet(s) and trying to place the information in a logical sequence of events. Blake, on the other hand, played the role of contractor because he was trying to organize our work with his timeline of events. His sheet was different than ours so he had the ability to add additional input to the progress the the completers had created.

I believe that having five seperate roles for each person in the group would have made solving the crime a little more manageable. The five roles that should have been present would have been the completer to summarize the team's findings into logical explanations; the communicator role would have been helpful because he would have made sure that the team was actively listening to any subtle clues that may have given us a lead; the contractor would have been useful because they could have put together the timeline of events that were listed on the sheets; The coordinator would have been helpful because they could have been aligning individuals thoughts with the rest of the team's. Finally, the calibrator would have been necessary to make sure that everyone was saying what was on their minds.

I believe that our group is in the performing stage of development because everyone is able to freely express their opinions with each while at the same time, attempting to complete every task/assignment/exercise to the best of their ability to maximize our outcome. In the case, the outcome of the effort put into a task would be the grade. Each members holds up his own share of the project and doing the work effectively.